For men. Upload your conversations with multiple women — all of them, the wins and the ghostings. Independent AI models debate the patterns in how you express yourself and carry yourself: confidence vs neediness, pacing, reading interest, how you handle silence. Then the council hands you the honest picture and a numbered game plan to up your dating game — grounded in authenticity and respect, never scripts. Your PDF lands in your inbox automatically. $100 USD.
Ask the council — $100 See a sample reportStripe checkout. $100 flat.
On the next page: your question, your situation, and any PDFs. Held only in memory — never stored.
On AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA — no outside model is ever contacted. Independent AIs open, critique each other, a chair writes the consensus.
The AI Opinion lands in your inbox automatically — usually within the hour. Then every copy of your data is gone.
Your documents and details are handled only in memory while the council debates, then discarded the moment your PDF is sent. No database, no folder, nothing to leak. The only record kept is the delivery email itself — fingerprinted (SHA-256) so the report's authenticity can always be proven and forgeries disproven.
Every AI model runs on AWS Bedrock under a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA). No outside model is ever contacted; your case is sent only to those in-BAA models and is never stored.
Your material produces your report and nothing else — it is never used to train models, ours or anyone's.
100% automated end to end — never reviewed by any human being.
Card data goes to Stripe's hosted checkout and never touches our servers.
Everything you send travels over TLS-encrypted connections.
The purpose of the AI Council is to throw complex topics and discussions into debate between independent, integrated AI models and LLMs — positions, critique, consensus — and hand you the result, while protecting your security, confidentiality, and anonymity: every AI model runs on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA Business Associate Agreement (BAA), no outside model is ever contacted, and nothing you send is ever stored — it is held in memory only while the council debates, then discarded. Every AI Council product is 100% automated, never reviewed by any human being, and never used for training, ours or anyone's.
The same council that runs our medical and legal checks — models scoring ~92% on medical licensing (MedQA) and 82–84% on legal reasoning (LegalBench) — running pattern analysis across your whole dating corpus. Still AI opinions: honest over flattering is the standing instruction, and it will not hand you manipulation tactics.
| Who | Medicine — MedQA (USMLE-style) | Law — LegalBench (legal reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Expert physicians, same questionshuman reference | 87% Liévin et al. ↗ | |
| Human passing threshold (USMLE-style)human reference | ≈60% PLOS Digit. Health ↗ | |
| Passing-lawyer threshold (bar exam MBE — a different test, shown for context)human reference | ≈60% NCBE ↗ | |
| Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic · chairs the consensus | 92.5% vals.ai ↗ | 83.5% vals.ai ↗ |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · senior seat | 92.1% vals.ai ↗ | 82.1% vals.ai ↗ |
| Amazon Nova ProAmazon · document analysis | 81.1% Stanford HELM ↗ | 73.6% Stanford HELM ↗ |
| Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · fast seat | 79.6% vals.ai ↗ | 81.2% vals.ai ↗ |
| Llama 4 MaverickMeta · open-weight diversity | 43.3% vals.ai ↗anomalously low vs its own model family on this harness — its legal score is 77.8% | 77.8% vals.ai ↗ |
| Amazon Nova LiteAmazon · fast cross-check seat — cross-checks, never chairs | —no published score for this exact model | —no published score for this exact model |
| Llama 3.3 70BMeta · independent reasoning seat | —closest published sibling (Llama 3.1 70B): 84.8% vals.ai ↗ | 77.2% vals.ai ↗ |
| Mistral Pixtral LargeMistral (EU) · European lab · vision seat | —its text backbone (Mistral Large 24.11): 76.2% vals.ai ↗ | —no published score for this exact model |
RandomCheck runs the live council seats on every $5 question.
Independent published evals of the exact model versions where available — siblings labeled as such, no score invented, re-verified 2026-07-03. Official benchmarks: MedQA paper · MedQA data · LegalBench · LegalBench paper. Independent leaderboards: vals.ai MedQA · vals.ai LegalBench · Stanford HELM · NCBE MBE. Scores move as models ship.
| Dating coach program (multi-week) | $1,500 – $8,000 |
| Image / communication consultant | $500 – $2,500 |
| Therapist working through your patterns (10 sessions) | $1,500 – $2,500 |
| Your friends’ analysis | free — and they haven’t read the texts |
| AlphaCheck full-corpus pattern analysis | $100 USD |
Nobody has ever read ALL your conversations side by side — including you. The patterns are only visible across the whole corpus.
Our system doesn't replace any of them — but it sure helps to educate you before you pay them.
Pay first, then you'll describe your situation, tell the council your country and state/province, and upload documents on the next page — because we store nothing, your details are only ever handled in memory while the council debates, then discarded. The opinion is grounded in your jurisdiction's laws and guidelines, never a default. See a sample report first →
No. The council is explicitly instructed to refuse manipulation scripts. What you get is pattern truth — how you actually come across in text — and upgrades grounded in confidence, authenticity, and respect. That IS the game.
The standing instruction is honest over flattering. If you come across needy, it says needy — with the quotes that prove it. That’s what you’re paying for.
Every model runs on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA, no outside model is contacted, and nothing you send is stored — it is handled in memory while the council reads YOUR patterns, then discarded. Never used for training.