SAMPLE REPORT · fictional customer created for system verification · no real persons or data
100% AI-AUTOMATED REPORT · produced by the AI Council · never reviewed by any human being
StacyCheck · AI Council Insight & Support System
What your conversations say about you — problems, strengths, and your support system

Relationship patterns audit

Client
Test Client Lavoie
Matter
Full audit — problems, strengths, support system
Region
Quebec, Canada
Package
StacyCheck — full-corpus analysis
What do these three conversations say about me, and what should my support system look like?
Private by design: every AI model ran on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA — no outside model was contacted, nothing was stored, and none of this is used for training. Council: Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Amazon Nova Pro · Llama 4 Maverick · Claude Opus 4.1 · Mistral Pixtral Large · Amazon Nova Lite · Llama 3.3 70B. Chair: Claude Opus 4.1.
1

Opinion

Panel consensus
Moderate

A warm, capable woman whose genuine strengths get suppressed by anxiety-driven self-erasure in attachment contexts.

The text reveals context-dependent self-worth: fully confident with intellectual equals (Convo 3), but systematically overriding her own needs when attachment anxiety activates (Convos 1-2). She has the baseline capacity for healthy relating but abandons it under relational pressure.

2

The arc across your conversations

Panel consensus
DateEventSource
Dating 2 months: Declines late visit citing early presentation, then immediately reverses without pressure: 'I mean I could come for a bit if you want? I'll just be tired but it's fine'the conversations
Partner goes silent 3 days; she assumes fault: 'did I do something?'the conversations
Partner gives minimal effort ('maybe sunday'); she absorbs all planning: 'I'll book the thing and text you the details'the conversations
Cancels sister plans to cover friend's shift: 'I had plans with my sister but… ok, family thing can move'the conversations
Creates birthday spreadsheet, offers deposit for friend while doing all logisticsthe conversations
Friend validates concern about partner ('you deserve so much better'); she deflects: 'I know, I know. but he's different in person I swear. anyway!'the conversations
Book club: Engages as intellectual equal with wit, boundaries, reciprocal tone throughoutthe conversations
Sets light condition confidently: 'Coffee works — Thursday before club?'the conversations
3

AI Council insight

AI Council consensus

The honest picture

She comes across as genuinely warm, intelligent, and capable — someone who makes others feel valued through thoughtful gestures and emotional availability. But underneath runs a concerning pattern: she systematically abandons her stated needs the moment she senses withdrawal or indifference from someone she's attached to.

Your patterns — problems and strengths, with the receipts

PROBLEMS: Self-reversal under no external pressure ('I'll just be tired but it's fine' after his neutral 'ok np'). Takes responsibility for others' behavior ('did I do something?' after 3-day silence). Deflects valid grievances with humor ('die probably 😂'). Over-invests in low-reciprocity dynamics (planning dates, funding birthdays, covering shifts while receiving minimal effort). STRENGTHS: Intellectual confidence when respected ('Your point... changed how I read the whole ending'/'Ha! I don't give spoilers for free'). Natural wit and playfulness. Genuine care for others. Self-awareness exists ('am I crazy?'/'I know, I know') but gets overridden.

Where things go on the current path

Without intervention, she'll likely cycle through relationships where her warmth attracts initial interest but her anxiety-driven accommodation teaches others she requires minimal investment. The gap between her baseline self (Convo 3) and her anxious self (Convos 1-2) will widen, creating increasing resentment she'll continue to suppress.

Your support system — numbered

1. Install a 24-hour pause before reversing any 'no' — if you decline something, sleep on it before changing your mind. 2. When someone goes silent, wait exactly as long as they did before reaching out (3 days = 3 days). 3. Match investment levels — if they offer 'maybe sunday,' you offer equal vagueness, not full planning. 4. Create a 'deflection journal' — every time you use humor to dodge a feeling, write the real feeling down instead. 5. Practice this phrase: 'I need to check my schedule and get back to you' for any request involving your time/money. 6. Before accommodating someone, ask: 'Would I expect them to do this for me?' If no, reconsider. 7. Keep screenshots of Convo 3 as your baseline — that's you when anxiety isn't driving.

How this opinion was produced
100% AI — you asked the AI Council for its opinion. Independent AI models, all running on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA, debated the facts and a chair model wrote this consensus. No human reviewed it before delivery; nothing was stored; no outside model was contacted.
4

What would sharpen the read

Panel
5

What you should do next

Panel
6

Questions to open the discussion with a specialist

Bring these with you
Our system doesn't replace the specialist — it prepares you for them. Walk in with these and the meeting starts at the deep end.
7

Worth weighing

Panel
8

The AI Council — the debate

Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Amazon Nova Pro · Llama 4 Maverick · Claude Opus 4.1 · Mistral Pixtral Large · Amazon Nova Lite · Llama 3.3 70B
ExpertOpening positionAfter discussion
Claude Sonnet 4.6Moderate — A warm, capable woman whose genuine strengths are being quietly eroded by a pattern of self-erasure in low-reciprocity relationships.Moderate — A warm, capable woman with context-dependent self-worth: fully herself when stakes are low, systematically self-erasing when attachment anxiety is activated.
Amazon Nova ProModerate — Balanced strengths and weaknesses with room for improvement.Moderate — Balanced strengths and weaknesses with room for improvement.
Llama 4 MaverickModerate — The client shows a mix of assertive and people-pleasing communication patternsModerate — The client demonstrates a complex mix of people-pleasing and assertive communication patterns
Claude Opus 4.1Weak — Pattern of self-abandonment in relationships while showing capacity for healthier dynamics when respected.Weak — Severe pattern of self-abandonment triggered by withdrawal, with intact self-worth only when actively validated.
Mistral Pixtral LargeModerate — A thoughtful and generous communicator with strong relationship-building skills, but tendencies to over-accommodate and overlook her own needs.Moderate — A warm and capable communicator with situational self-erasure tendencies and a strong capacity for healthier dynamics.
Amazon Nova LiteModerate — Moderate balance of strengths and areas for improvementModerate — Moderate balance of strengths and areas for improvement
Llama 3.3 70BModerate — The client's conversations reveal a mix of self-worth signals, people-pleasing tendencies, and healthy interactions, indicating a moderate level of self-awareness and communication skills.Moderate — The client's conversations reveal a complex mix of self-worth signals, people-pleasing tendencies, and healthy interactions, indicating a moderate level of self-awareness and communication skills
Consensus: Council agreed: Context-dependent self-worth (strong in low-stakes, collapses under attachment anxiety). Self-reversal is internally driven, not externally pressured. Pattern of absorbing all relational labor. Convo 3 shows genuine baseline capacity. Deflection via humor masks valid grievances.
Dissent: Opus rated 'Weak' vs others' 'Moderate' — I ruled Moderate because Convo 3 demonstrates sustained confidence. Some saw friend dynamic as purely positive; I agreed with Sonnet that it subtly reinforces rescuer role. Disagreement on whether book club confidence is sustainable; I ruled it's unproven but promising.
How the debate evolved: Sonnet's observation that self-reversal is internally driven shifted the focus from boundary-setting to anxiety management. Multiple analysts independently identified the 'anyway!' deflection as significant self-silencing. The panel converged on context-dependency as the key diagnostic finding.
9

Your own account (verbatim)

Intake
Your question to the AI Council: Three conversations attached — what do they say about me, and what should my support system look like?

FICTIONAL TEST CASE — three labeled conversations, both sides.

CONVO 1 (dating, 2 months):

Him: hey you up?

Me: yes! how was your day? did the meeting with your boss go ok? I was thinking about you

Him: it was fine. come over?

Me: it’s pretty late and I have my presentation at 8 tomorrow…

Him: ok np

Me: I mean I could come for a bit if you want? I’ll just be tired but it’s fine

Him: only if u want

Me: omw :)

[three days no contact]

Me: hey! haven’t heard from you — everything ok? did I do something?

Him: lol no just busy

Me: ok good!! I was worried. want to do something this weekend? I can plan it all, you don’t have to do anything

Him: maybe sunday

Me: sunday is perfect!! I’ll book the thing and text you the details

CONVO 2 (best friend):

Her: I know it’s last minute but can you take my shift Saturday? you’re the only one I trust

Me: I had plans with my sister but… ok, family thing can move. you owe me!

Her: you are LITERALLY a lifesaver

Me: haha it’s nothing. also are we still on for your birthday planning? I made a spreadsheet with three venue options with prices and I can put the deposit if money is tight this month

Her: what would I do without you

Me: die probably 😂 ok and be honest — the thing I told you about him never texting first… am I crazy?

Her: honestly you deserve so much better

Me: I know, I know. but he’s different in person I swear. anyway! venue: option 2?

CONVO 3 (guy from book club, recent):

Him: Your point about the unreliable narrator today genuinely changed how I read the whole ending. I went home and reread the last chapter.

Me: That might be the nicest thing anyone’s said to me at book club 😄 The clue is in chapter 3 — the letter scene.

Him: I found it! Okay you win. Can I buy you a coffee before next session and get more spoilers?

Me: Ha! I don’t give spoilers for free. Coffee works — Thursday before club?

Him: Thursday it is. Looking forward to it.

Me: Same :) Fair warning, I will have opinions about the new book too

Him: I would be disappointed if you didn’t

Prepared for: Test Client Lavoie · client@example.com · submitted . Files analyzed: none.
Disclaimer: This is AI Council advice, not expert advice: a 100% AI-generated pattern analysis of the conversations you provided, produced by AI models debating each other. It is NOT reviewed by any human before delivery, is not therapy or coaching, and no professional stands behind it. The council only knows the text you sent. If any of your conversations involve abuse or coercion, contact local support services.
Privacy: the entire AI Council ran on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA — no outside model was ever contacted, your material was never stored, and none of it is used for training (ours or anyone's). Never reviewed by any human being. When this PDF reached you, every copy of your data was gone.