SAMPLE REPORT · fictional customer created for system verification · no real persons or data
100% AI-AUTOMATED REPORT · produced by the AI Council · never reviewed by any human being
DivorceCheck · AI Opinion
100% AI divorce-position assessment

Separation agreement review

Client
Test Client Tremblay
Matter
Review a draft separation agreement before I sign
Region
Quebec, Canada
Package
DivorceCheck — 5-AI Council
Should I sign this draft separation agreement that offers me $40,000 total, no spousal support, and deferred child support, or am I giving up more than Quebec rules and guidelines say I would get?
Private by design: every AI model ran on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA — no outside model was contacted, nothing was stored, and none of this is used for training. Council: Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Amazon Nova Pro · Llama 4 Maverick · Claude Opus 4.1 · Mistral Pixtral Large. Chair: Claude Opus 4.1.
1

Opinion

Panel consensus
Strong

Do not sign — the draft severely undervalues your entitlements by at least $200,000+ in property alone, plus years of support payments

Under Quebec's mandatory family patrimony rules, you're entitled to ~$155,000 just from the home equity (half of $310,000), plus half your spouse's pension value accrued during marriage, versus the $40,000 offered. Add spousal support ($2,000-3,500/month for 6-12 years given the $88,000 income gap) and child support (~$1,900/month), and you're potentially waiving $400,000+ in total value.

2

Case & financial chronology

Panel consensus
DateEventSource
2012Marriage begins in Quebecclient narrative
2012-202412-year marriage, two children born (now ages 8 and 10)client narrative
During marriageSpouse acquires rental condominiumclient narrative
CurrentClient earns $52,000 annuallyclient narrative
CurrentSpouse earns $140,000+ (bonuses undocumented)client narrative
CurrentFamily home valued at $520,000client narrative
CurrentMortgage balance $210,000 (net equity $310,000)client narrative
CurrentSpouse has employer pension from before/during marriageclient narrative
2024Draft agreement offers: $40,000 lump sum, no spousal support, child support 'to be reviewed later'draft separation agreement
2024Draft assigns family home and rental condo entirely to spousedraft separation agreement
2024Draft waives all family patrimony claims beyond $40,000draft separation agreement
3

Panel opinion

AI Council consensus

Impression

The draft agreement is dramatically unfair and likely unenforceable on several grounds

Analysis — property, support, parenting

PROPERTY: Family patrimony (arts. 414-426 CCQ) mandates 50/50 division of family residence ($155,000 your share), spouse's pension accrued during marriage (requires actuarial valuation), and any RRSPs accumulated during marriage. Rental condo subject to acquests regime unless marriage contract exists. Total property entitlement likely $200,000+. SPOUSAL SUPPORT: SSAG range for 12-year marriage with $88,000 income gap: $2,000-3,500/month for 6-12 years. CHILD SUPPORT: Quebec tables at $140,000 for 2 children: ~$1,900/month mandatory, cannot be deferred.

Realistic outcome range

If litigated: court would likely award $155,000+ for home equity, half pension value, $2,000-3,500/month spousal support for 6-12 years, $1,900/month child support. If negotiated properly: settlement in $250,000-350,000 range plus ongoing support.

The costs ahead: contested vs negotiated vs uncontested

Contested divorce: $25,000-50,000 legal fees, 12-18 months. Negotiated settlement with proper disclosure: $10,000-15,000, 3-6 months. Current draft if signed: saves fees now but forfeits $300,000+ in entitlements.

How this opinion was produced
100% AI — you asked the AI Council for its opinion. Independent AI models, all running on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA, debated the facts and a chair model wrote this consensus. No human reviewed it before delivery; nothing was stored; no outside model was contacted.
4

Documents that would strengthen your position

Panel
5

What you should do next

Panel
6

Questions to open the discussion with a specialist

Bring these with you
Our system doesn't replace the specialist — it prepares you for them. Walk in with these and the meeting starts at the deep end.
7

Considerations for your family lawyer

Panel
8

The AI Council — the debate

Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Amazon Nova Pro · Llama 4 Maverick · Claude Opus 4.1 · Mistral Pixtral Large
ExpertOpening positionAfter discussion
Claude Sonnet 4.6Strong — This draft agreement appears to significantly undervalue the client's entitlements under Quebec's mandatory family patrimony rules and applicable support guidelines.Strong — The draft agreement severely undervalues the client's entitlements under Quebec's mandatory family patrimony regime and support guidelines; the client must not sign without independent legal counsel, full financial disclosure, and actuarial pension valuation.
Amazon Nova ProStrong — The draft agreement appears to be unfavorable to [[NAME_1]] based on Quebec's family law principles.Strong — The draft agreement appears significantly unfavorable to [[NAME_1]] based on Quebec's family law principles.
Llama 4 MaverickWeak — The draft agreement likely undervalues [[NAME_1]]'s entitlements under Quebec law.Strong — The draft agreement severely undervalues [[NAME_1]]'s entitlements under Quebec law.
Claude Opus 4.1Strong — The draft agreement severely undervalues your entitlements under Quebec's family patrimony regime and support guidelines.Strong — The draft agreement severely undervalues entitlements by at least $200,000+ and violates mandatory Quebec family law provisions.
Mistral Pixtral LargeStrong — The draft agreement appears significantly unfair and not aligned with Quebec family law principles.Strong — The draft agreement is fundamentally unfair and fails to comply with Quebec's family patrimony and support guidelines.
Consensus: All analysts agreed: family patrimony mandates ~$155,000 for home equity alone, pension must be valued and divided, child support cannot be deferred under Quebec law, zero spousal support dramatically departs from SSAG ranges given 12-year marriage and $88,000 income gap
Dissent: Nova Pro and Llama incorrectly stated rental condo was family patrimony (it's acquests property). Mistral confused bonuses as divisible property rather than imputable income. Panel underweighted settlement-risk if client signs due to pressure. Ruling: rental condo is acquests not patrimony; bonuses are income for support not property division; settlement pressure is the most urgent practical risk.
How the debate evolved: Initial positions correctly identified the draft's inadequacy but conflated family patrimony with acquests regime. Discussion clarified that rental property falls under different rules than family residence, and that bonuses affect support calculations not property division. Opus provided concrete support estimates that grounded the analysis.
9

Your own account (verbatim)

Intake
Your question to the AI Council: My spouse’s lawyer sent the attached draft agreement — am I giving up more than Quebec rules and the guidelines say I would get?

FICTIONAL TEST CASE. Married 12 years in Quebec, two kids (8 and 10). I earn $52,000; my spouse earns about $140,000 plus bonuses that never show up in the numbers. Family home is worth about $520,000 with $210,000 left on the mortgage; my spouse also has an employer pension since before the wedding and a rental condo bought during the marriage. The draft agreement offers me $40,000 total, no spousal support, child support "to be reviewed later", and I keep my own small RRSP. I want out but I do not want to be foolish.

Prepared for: Test Client Tremblay · client@example.com · submitted . Files analyzed: test-records.pdf.
Disclaimer: This is an informational, 100% AI-generated assessment of one side’s position in a divorce or separation. It is NOT reviewed by a lawyer or any human before delivery, is not legal advice, does not create a lawyer–client relationship, and does not replace a family lawyer in your jurisdiction. Never sign a separation agreement on the basis of this report alone. If you are unsafe at home, contact local emergency services or a domestic-violence hotline first.
Privacy: the entire AI Council ran on AWS Bedrock under a signed HIPAA BAA — no outside model was ever contacted, your material was never stored, and none of it is used for training (ours or anyone's). Never reviewed by any human being. When this PDF reached you, every copy of your data was gone.